Cereal Aisle Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Cereal Aisle Analysis - Essay ExampleMy observations are compiled in short statements in this report. First of all, there were ten different tags on display, out of which I could easily recognize three. These were Kelloggs, Malt-O- Meal, and Cheerios. Among the Kelloggs brand, and in the Breakfast Cereal category, there were 27 varieties of Breakfast Cereals, ranging from All- Bran to Mini Wheat. Each one of them had their cook and specialty prominently displayed on its cover. They were of distinct flavor and were available in five different sizes. The packets were specially designed to attract children. The focus on pugilism and labeling was such that many children were fascinated with them. (Kellogs, 2011)The second observation was that of brand Malt-O Meal .The packing of Malt-O Meal was very attractive and the shelves were segregated in two parts, low temperature and hot cereals. There was another category named Natural Cereal. On closer examination I found that they do no t put artificial colorize and used only natural preservatives. It gave a feeling that the company cares for the health of its customers. This made the choice easier, especially for the parents (MALT-O-MEAL, 2011)The third prominent brand which I observed was Cheerios. They had varieties for kids, parents, families and adults. I found it very interesting and observed that in the aisle only products meant for kids were stored. The packets were very substantially designed and as the name suggests, the labeling and packing conveyed the meaning of having fun (General Mills, 2011). I also observed the behavior of shoppers very minutely and there were six distinct behaviors which are worth mentioning here. In some cases, the children motto the displayed packets and took permission of their parents to go and have a look. Once they liked it, they took it out from the respective shelf and put it up for their parents to approve their choice. This type children were very well behaved and I did not find a singly parent declining the request of their children. The second behavior was different from the first one, in the sense that the children left their parents choke and simply grabbed the brand of their liking, In this case also, the parents were in agreement with the childrens choice but before they agreed, they did have a look at the brand and its label and read the nutritional value of the contents. In the third case, some children first grabbed the brand which they liked and then asked their parents for approval. This behavior was frowned upon by the parents. In the twenty-five percent instance, the children saw the brand, liked it but their parents were simply aghast with the choice and refused to buy it for them. Later on, after a lot of persuasion they did ask the